Photo of K-D, a black and white pitbull mix dog, gives da-AL a kiss on the cheek as she holds a book.

Banned Books Week + How Alex Diaz-Granados Wrote His First Novel

Books, glorious books! The very act of holding one and transmitting its words into my brain, whether I disagree with them, don’t fully understand their concepts, and am uncomfortable with the emotions they evoke — they always make me come away smarter and more sensitive. So much so, that I’ve written some books of my own (click here for info on the three novels I’m seeking representation for by a great literary agent).

Photo of K-D, a black and white pitbull mix dog, gives da-AL a kiss on the cheek as she holds a book.
K-D and I love books!

It’s Banned Books Week here in the United States — oh, the shame of our increasing number of groups pumping politicians harder than ever to censor what books line the shelves of our libraries. 

Conservatives maintain that everyone, especially our youth, needs protection — but from what? Is it really that damaging to see the antics of Where’s Waldo’s friends? And is it truly possible for anyone to not come away a better person for having read To Kill a Mockingbird? Reading, unlike watching and consuming, requires thinking.

Books helped me thrive in, not just survive, a continually gaslit childhood. Everything I felt or thought was deemed incorrect, and the family culture was, “don’t ever be too joyful, giddy, or silly. Disappointment is inevitable and dreaming makes it hurt worse.” At 11-years-old, when I stumbled onto my mom‘s collection of Marquis de Sade’s short stories, I was too young to understand the sex. All I understood were the depictions of brutal lives, wherein bad people weren’t punished and good ones weren’t rewarded. Wow! I finally felt seen. The very French-literature “life sucks and then you die“ philosophy was exactly how my folks insisted I navigate life. Seeing it in print shone a light on how opposite European story-telling was from that of the United States, where all endings are hopeful and redemptive. And that meant maybe I could choose how I approached life!

So, dear readers, I urge you help everyone understand that regardless of our personal preferences, let’s not decide what others should or shouldn’t read. Reading is special, and we each come to it differently. The effect of stories evolves throughout our lives, often in unpredictable ways that improve us.

Photo of author/blogger Alex Diaz-Granados out in nature
Author/blogger Alex Diaz-Granados

Today’s guest blog post is thanks to author/blogger Alex Diaz-Granados, who also writes books. Here he describes how he decided to write his first novel by following up an existing novella instead of choosing genre fiction…

Cover of Reunion: Coda by Alex Diaz-Granados

How I Came to Write My First Novel by Alex Diaz-Granados

Reunion: Coda – The Unexpected Sequel

A Sequel’s Seeds

“You know, Alex, I liked Reunion. A lot. You should write a sequel!” – Many Readers Since 1999

“Why not dream your own wonderful sequels? When you have finished a book, it can go on in your mind, the characters doing just what you want them to do.” ― Marguerite Henry, Dear Readers and Riders

The Inception of Reunion

Back in 1998, when I first crafted Reunion: A Story to flex my fiction-writing muscles, I envisioned Jim Garraty’s adventure as merely a singular narrative. To me, it was an elegant musing on adolescent turmoil, the wounds from a fractured relationship, and their deep impact on my protagonist, particularly regarding high school dramas, losses, and missed opportunities. With the demise of Reunion’s heroine, I believed the tale had reached its natural conclusion, at least in terms of Jim and Marty’s saga.

Reader Enthusiasm and Author’s Doubts

When I initially shared my draft of Reunion (originally titled “Love Unbroken, Love Unspoken”) with a handful of friends—mostly women—the most frequent response was, “Wow, Alex. This is fantastic! Why not write a sequel?”

Maybe it was my own limited imagination or the author’s self-doubt, but for almost thirty years, whenever someone asked, “Will there be a follow-up to Reunion: A Story?” my response was always, “Unfortunately not. I can’t envision how I could expand upon it, particularly one that explores Marty’s story in greater depth.”

Proposed Sequels and Fresh Perspectives

Yet, the idea of revisiting Jim and Marty’s world never completely faded. It lingered in the back of my mind, occasionally surfacing when readers expressed their love for the characters and their desire to see more of their journey. Despite my initial resistance, the notion of a sequel began to take shape, spurred by renewed inspiration and a fresh perspective on the characters’ potential growth.

In recent years, I’ve revisited Reunion with a more open mind, contemplating the nuances of Jim and Marty’s relationship and the unresolved questions that might still haunt them. The more I pondered, the more I realized that their story wasn’t entirely finished. There were new layers to uncover, new conflicts to explore, and new paths for the characters to tread.

The process of developing a sequel has been both challenging and exhilarating. It’s required me to dig deeper into the characters’ psyches, to understand their motivations and fears on a more profound level. I’ve had to confront my own uncertainties as a writer and push beyond the boundaries of the original narrative to create something that feels both authentic and compelling.

Reunion: Coda is not just a continuation of Jim and Marty’s story; it’s an evolution. It’s about growth, redemption, and the enduring impact of past choices on our present and future selves. It’s about finding closure in unexpected places and discovering that some stories are meant to be revisited, reexamined, and retold.

As I prepare to share this new chapter with you, I am filled with a mix of excitement and trepidation. Writing a sequel to a beloved story is a daunting task, but it’s also a deeply rewarding one. I hope that Reunion: Coda will resonate with you as profoundly as the original did and that it will offer new insights and experiences to cherish.

Thank you for your unwavering support and enthusiasm. Here’s to the next chapter in the journey of Reunion—and to the endless possibilities that lie ahead.

Do you believe library books should be censored?

Subscribe, listen to, and share Happiness Between Tails Podcast on most any platform; from Spotify and Apple Podcasts andBreaker, to Pocket Casts and RadioPublic and Castbox, plus many more and an RSS feed. The full list of 50+ places is H-E-R-E.


Discover more from Happiness Between Tales (and Tails) by da-AL

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

35 thoughts on “Banned Books Week + How Alex Diaz-Granados Wrote His First Novel”

  1. I like the expression “flexing my novel writing muscles”, haha, seems like Alex flexed them well 😉

    About the book banning: I am in principle against it with the exceptions mentioned by Dawn. And I wouldn’t approve of books that vilify people to instigate genocide. But reporting of a genocide that happened and should not happen again, is different. If reports about slavery make people feel “uncomfortable”, why do they read murder, torture and war stories. Does that make them feel comfortable?

    My parents tried to censor our reading, but I just read what I wanted to read from their bookshelves, when they were away. It didn’t harm me, I think. 😉

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I’m against book banning. This “Parental Rights” bullcrap is simply an excuse to take rights away from children, including the right to become well-educated. And every time a book is banned, it makes people just want to read it more!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. It was very interesting and fun to see Alex guest post here, and to read about the background to his upcoming novel. I read his first novella and I loved it.

    About banned books. I certainly don’t think books should be banned in general, in society. This is not a decision for politicians. However, I think each club/school/organization/family has the right to decide what is appropriate for the children in their organization/family. But I encourage parents to be open minded and allow their children to explore, within the limits of what is appropriate. It is not a black and white thing.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes I think there’s quite a difference between public and private Parents should keep informed of their children’s lives and guide them accordingly, without others making their decisions

      Liked by 1 person

    2. The problem with this issue is that politicians and big money donors know that it is not a good look for them to ban books or allow them to be removed from school libraries. So what they do is fund so-called “grass roots” groups (such as Moms for Liberty) and allow them to do their dirty work for them under the guise of parental rights. And, of course, since the folks behind book bans are conservatives, they seek to ban books related in some way to topics they don’t like, such as the existence of bigotry in America, for instance. They aren’t content in keeping “controversial” books away from their children; they want to make sure that no one else’s kids read those books. In essence, they’re imposing their worldview on everyone else, all in the name of “parental rights.”

      Liked by 1 person

        1. And let’s not forget that the book bans also include any novels about the Holocaust, the Jim Crow era, the near-extermination of the Native American tribes, and slavery in America. “We don’t want our kids to feel bad about being white” seems to be their little mantra.

          Liked by 3 people

Leave a reply to thomasstigwikman Cancel reply